Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Flux control efficiency"

From Bioblast
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MitoPedia
{{MitoPedia
|abbr=''FCF''
|abbr=''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>''
|description='''Flux control factors''' express the control of respiration by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', as a fractional change of flux from ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'', normalized for ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' is the [[reference state]] with high (stimulated or un-inhibited) flux; ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is the [[background state]] at low flux, upon which ''X'' acts.
|description='''Flux control efficiencies''' express the control of respiration by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', as a fractional change of flux from ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'', normalized for ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' is the [[reference state]] with high (stimulated or un-inhibited) flux; ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is the [[background state]] at low flux, upon which ''X'' acts.


:: ''j<sub>X</sub>'' = (''Z<sub>X</sub>-Y<sub>X</sub>'')/''Z<sub>X</sub>'' = 1-''Y<sub>X</sub>''/''Z<sub>X</sub>''
:: ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' = (''Z<sub>X</sub>-Y<sub>X</sub>'')/''Z<sub>X</sub>'' = 1-''Y<sub>X</sub>''/''Z<sub>X</sub>''


Complementary to the concept of [[flux control ratio]]s and analogous to [[elasticity|elasticities]] of [[metabolic control analysis]], the flux control factor of ''X'' upon background ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is expressed as the change of flux from ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' normalized for the reference state ''Z<sub>X</sub>''.
Complementary to the concept of [[flux control ratio]]s and analogous to [[elasticity|elasticities]] of [[metabolic control analysis]], the flux control efficiency of ''X'' upon background ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is expressed as the change of flux from ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' normalized for the reference state ''Z<sub>X</sub>''.
» [[#Flux_control_factor:_normalization_of_mitochondrial_respiration | '''MiPNet article''']]
» [[Flux_control_efficiency#Flux_control_efficiency:_normalization_of_mitochondrial_respiration | '''MiPNet article''']]
|info=[[Gnaiger 2014 MitoPathways]]
|info=[[Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways]]
}}
{{MitoPedia methods
|mitopedia method=Respirometry
}}
{{MitoPedia topics
|mitopedia topic=Respiratory state, Respiratory control ratio
}}
}}
__TOC__
__TOC__
= Flux control factor: normalization of mitochondrial respiration =
= Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration =
{{Publication
{{Publication
|title=Gnaiger E (2014) Flux control factor: normalization of mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondr Physiol Network 2014-08-10.
|title=Gnaiger E (2020) Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondr Physiol Network 2016-03-20; updated 2020-11-10.
|info=[[Gnaiger 2014 MitoPathways]]
|info=[[Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways]]
|authors=OROBOROS
|authors=Oroboros
|year=2014
|year=2020
|journal=MiPNet
|journal=MiPNet
|abstract=The concept of [[flux control ratio]]s is complemented by the '''flux control factor''' for normalization of respiration, which presents a generalized framework for assessing the effect of an experimental variable on flux and yields specific expressions, such as the biochemical coupling efficiency.
|abstract=The [[flux control efficiency]], ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'', and [[flux control ratio]], ''FCR'', are internal normalizations, expressing respiratory flux in a given state relative to respiratory flux in a reference state. Whereas ''FCR''s express various respiratory states relative to a common refrence state, ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' express the control of respiration in a single ''step'' caused by a specific metabolic control variable ''X''. The concept of the flux control efficiency presents a generalized framework for assessing the effect of an experimental variable on flux and defines specific expressions, such as the biochemical coupling efficiency.
|mipnetlab=AT Innsbruck Gnaiger E
|mipnetlab=AT Innsbruck Gnaiger E
}}
{{Labeling
|area=Respiration
|topics=Flux control
|instruments=Theory
}}
}}
== Metabolic control variable and respiratory state ==
== Metabolic control variable and respiratory state ==


A [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', is either added (stimulation, activation) or removed (reversal of inhibition) to yield a high flux in the[[reference state]], ''Z'', from the [[background state]], ''Y''. ''X'', ''Y'' and ''Z'' denote the metabolic control variable (''X'') or respiratory state (''Y, Z'') and the corresponding respiratory fluxes, ''X''=''Z-Y''.  
:::: A [[metabolic control variable]] ''X'' is either added (stimulation, activation) or removed (reversal of inhibition) to yield a high flux ''Z'' in the [[reference state]], compared to flux ''Y'' in the [[background state]]. ''X'' denotes the metabolic control variable; Y and Z are the respiratory states, whereas ''Y'' and ''Z'' denote the corresponding respiratory fluxes. ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' in ''step analysis'' relates to the change of flux caused by the variable ''X''. The ''FCR'' in ''state analysis'' compares fluxes in a variety of respiratory states which may be separated by single or multiple variables, i.e. separated by several [[Coupling-control state |coupling]] and [[pathway control states]].


If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-''X''); then ''Y'' is the background state in the presence of the inhibitor.
:::: If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-''X''); then ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is the background rate in the presence of the inhibitor.
* ''X'': '''Metabolic control variable''' acting on the [[background state]], ''Y'', to yield the [[reference state]], ''Z''. ''X'' stimulates or un-inhibits ''Y'' from low flux to ''Z'' at high flux.
::::* ''X'': '''Metabolic control variable''' acting on ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[background state]], to yield rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[reference state]]. ''X'' stimulates or un-inhibits ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' from low flux to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' at high flux.
* ''Y'': The '''background state''' is the non-activated or inhibited respiratory state at low flux in relation to the [[reference state]], ''Z''. A [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', acts on ''Y'' (substrate, activator) or is removed from ''Y'' (inhibitor) to yield ''Z''. The ''X''-specific (in contrast to general) [[flux control ratio]] is ''j<sub>Y</sub>'' = ''Y/Z''.
::::* ''Y<sub>X</sub>'': The rate in the '''background state''' Y is the non-activated or inhibited respiratory rate (low) in relation to the high rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[reference state]] Z. A [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', acts on ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' (substrate, activator) or is removed from Y (inhibitor) to yield ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. The ''X''-specific (in contrast to general) [[flux control ratio]] is ''Y/Z''.
* ''Z'': The '''reference state''', stimulated or un-inhibited by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', with high flux in relation to the [[background state]], ''Y''.
::::* ''Z<sub>X</sub>'': The rate in the '''reference state''' Z, stimulated or un-inhibited by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', with high rate in relation to rate ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[background state]] Y.




== Substrate control factor ==
== Pathway control efficiency ==


[[Substrate control factor]]s express the relative change of oxygen flux in response to a transition of substrate availability in a defined coupling state.
:::: [[Pathway control efficiency |Pathway control efficiencies]] express the relative change of oxygen flux in response to a transition of (''1'') CHNO-fuel substrates or (''2'') inhibitors of enzyme steps in the pathway, in a defined coupling state.
* [[CII control factor]], [[CI control factor]]
::::» [[NS-N pathway control efficiency]]
:: [[CI]] and [[CII]] are abbreviations for Complex I and Complex II, but indicate here CI-linked respiration (with pyruvate, glutamate, malate, or other ETS competent CI-linked substrate combinations) and CII-linked (with succinate) respiration. CI&II indicates respiration with a CI-and CII-linked substrate cocktail. The nomenclature using subscripts helps to distinguish CI'''+'''CII is the calculated sum of CI- '''plus''' CII-linked respiration measured separately, versus CI'''&'''II as the measured flux in the presence of a combination of CI- '''and''' CII-linked substrates.




== Coupling control factor ==
== Coupling-control efficiency ==


[[Coupling control factor]]s are determined in an [[ETS-competent substrate state]].
:::: [[Coupling-control efficiency |Coupling-control efficiencies]] are determined in an [[ET-pathway competent state]]. The terms ''coupling efficiency'' and ''coupling-control efficiency'' are used synonymously.


=== mt-Preparations ===
=== mt-Preparations ===
[[Image:P.jpg|link=OXPHOS capacity|OXPHOS]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ETS capacity|ETS]]  
:::: [[Image:P.jpg|link=OXPHOS capacity|OXPHOS]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ET capacity|ET capacity]] In mitochondrial preparations, there are three well-defined coupling states of respiration, ''L'', ''P'', ''E'' ([[LEAK respiration]], [[OXPHOS]], [[Electron transfer pathway]]).
In mitochondrial preparations, there are three well-defined coupling states of respiration, ''L'', ''P'', ''E'' ([[LEAK]], [[OXPHOS]], [[ETS]]).
   
   
1. If the [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', is an [[uncoupler]], the reference state ''Z'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s, ''Y'', of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the ''L'' or ''P'' state in mt-preparations, and on the ''L'' or ''R'' state in intact cells. The corresponding coupling control factors are:  
::: 1. If the [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', is an [[uncoupler]], the reference rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s ''Y'', of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on ''L'' or ''P'' in mt-preparations. The corresponding flux control efficiencies are:  
* [[Biochemical coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-L</sub>'' = (''E-L'')/''E'' = 1-''L/E'' (''E-L'' coupling control factor).
::::* [[E-L coupling efficiency |''E-L'' coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-L</sub>'' = (''E-L'')/''E'' = 1-''L/E''.
* [[Excess E-P capacity factor |Excess ''E-P'' capacity factor]], ''ExP/E'' = (''E-P'')/''E'' = 1-''P/E''.
::::* [[E-P control efficiency |''E-P'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-P</sub>'' = (''E-P'')/''E'' = 1-''P/E''.


2. If the metablic control variable is stimulation by [[ADP]], D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference state ''Z'' is ''P'' at saturating concentrations of ADP. The background state ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding coupling control factor is:  
::: 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by [[ADP]], D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate ''Z'' is ''P'' at saturating concentrations of ADP. The background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:  
* [[OXPHOS coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>≈P</sub>'' = (''P-L'')/''P'' = 1-''L/P'' (phosphorylating respiration per OXPHOS capacity, related to the '''respiratory acceptor control ratio''', RCR). ''P-L'' or ''≈P'' control factor.
::::* [[P-L control efficiency |''P-L'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>P-L</sub>'' = (''P-L'')/''P'' = 1-''L/P'', related to the RCR.


3. If the background state ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''P'' is ADP saturated ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference state ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control factor is complex (compare 1 and 2):  
::: 3. If the background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''P'' is ADP-saturated ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control ratio is expressed as the [[net P/E control ratio |net ''P/E'' control ratio]] (compare 1 and 2):  
* (''P-L'')/''E'' ('''phosphorylating respiration per ETS capacity''').
::::* (''P-L'')/''E''




=== Intact cells ===
=== Living cells ===
[[Image:R.jpg|link=ROUTINE respiration|ROUTINE]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ETS capacity|ETS]]  
:::: [[Image:R.jpg|link=ROUTINE respiration|ROUTINE]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ET capacity|ET capacity]] ''L''(Omy) and ''E'' can be induced in living cells, but rate ''P'' cannot. However, the [[ROUTINE]] rate of respiration ''R'' can be measured in living cells.  
''L<sub>Omy</sub>'' and ''E'' can be induced in intact cells, but state ''P'' cannot. However, the [[ROUTINE]] state of respiration, ''R'', can be measured in intact cells.  


1. If the [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', is an [[uncoupler]], the reference state ''Z'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s, ''Y'', of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the ''L'' or ''R'' state in intact cells. The corresponding coupling control factors are:  
:::1. If the [[metabolic control variable]] ''X'' is an [[uncoupler]], the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s, Y of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the LEAK respiration or ROUTINE state in living cells. The corresponding coupling control efficiencies are:  
* [[Biochemical coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-L</sub>'' = (''E-L'')/''E'' = 1-''L/E'' (''E-L'' coupling control factor).
::::* [[E-L coupling efficiency |''E-L'' coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-L</sub>'' = (''E-L'')/''E'' = 1-''L/E''.
* [[Excess E-R capacity factor |Excess ''E-R'' capacity factor]], ''j<sub>E-P</sub>'' = (''E-R'')/''E'' = 1-''R/E''.
::::* [[E-R control efficiency |''E-R'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-R</sub>'' = (''E-R'')/''E'' = 1-''R/E''.


2. If the metablic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference state ''Z'' is ''R'' in intact cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background state ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding coupling control factor is:  
:::2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate ''Z'' is ''R'' in living cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:  
* [[ROUTINE coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>R-L</sub>'' = (''R-L'')/''R'' = 1-''L/R'' (''R-L'' or ''≈R'' coupling control factor).
::::* [[R-L control efficiency |''R-L'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>R-L</sub>'' = (''R-L'')/''R'' = 1-''L/R''.


3. If the background state ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''R'' is cell controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference state ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control factor is complex (compare 1 and 2):  
:::3. If the background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''R'' is cell-controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control ratio is expressed as the [[net R/E control ratio |net ''R/E'' control ratio]] (compare 1 and 2):  
* (''R-L'')/''E'' ('''ROUTINE phosphorylating respiration per ETS capacity''').
::::* (''R-L'')/''E''




== References ==
== References ==


* [[Gnaiger 2013 Abstract MiP2013|Biochemical coupling efficiency in permeabilized fibres from arm and leg muscle in Inuit versus Caucasians: A functional test of the uncoupling hypothesis in Greenland. Mitochondr Physiol Network 18.08.]]
::::* [[Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways]]
::::* [[Gnaiger 2015 Scand J Med Sci Sports]]
::::* [[Gnaiger 2013 Abstract MiP2013|Biochemical coupling efficiency in permeabilized fibres from arm and leg muscle in Inuit versus Caucasians: A functional test of the uncoupling hypothesis in Greenland. Mitochondr Physiol Network 18.08.]]
 
 
== Keywords ==
::::* Expand Bioblast links to '''Flux control efficiency'''
{{Template:Keywords: Coupling control}}
{{Template:Keywords: Normalization}}
 
{{MitoPedia concepts
|mitopedia concept=MiP concept, Respiratory control ratio, SUIT concept
}}
{{MitoPedia methods
|mitopedia method=Respirometry
}}
 
{{Labeling
|area=Respiration
|topics=Flux control
|instruments=Theory
}}

Latest revision as of 17:27, 1 January 2021


high-resolution terminology - matching measurements at high-resolution


Flux control efficiency

Description

Flux control efficiencies express the control of respiration by a metabolic control variable, X, as a fractional change of flux from YX to ZX, normalized for ZX. ZX is the reference state with high (stimulated or un-inhibited) flux; YX is the background state at low flux, upon which X acts.

jZ-Y = (ZX-YX)/ZX = 1-YX/ZX

Complementary to the concept of flux control ratios and analogous to elasticities of metabolic control analysis, the flux control efficiency of X upon background YX is expressed as the change of flux from YX to ZX normalized for the reference state ZX. » MiPNet article

Abbreviation: jZ-Y

Reference: Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways

Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration

Publications in the MiPMap
Gnaiger E (2020) Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondr Physiol Network 2016-03-20; updated 2020-11-10.

» Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways

Oroboros (2020) MiPNet

Abstract: The flux control efficiency, jZ-Y, and flux control ratio, FCR, are internal normalizations, expressing respiratory flux in a given state relative to respiratory flux in a reference state. Whereas FCRs express various respiratory states relative to a common refrence state, jZ-Y express the control of respiration in a single step caused by a specific metabolic control variable X. The concept of the flux control efficiency presents a generalized framework for assessing the effect of an experimental variable on flux and defines specific expressions, such as the biochemical coupling efficiency.


O2k-Network Lab: AT Innsbruck Gnaiger E

Metabolic control variable and respiratory state

A metabolic control variable X is either added (stimulation, activation) or removed (reversal of inhibition) to yield a high flux Z in the reference state, compared to flux Y in the background state. X denotes the metabolic control variable; Y and Z are the respiratory states, whereas Y and Z denote the corresponding respiratory fluxes. jZ-Y in step analysis relates to the change of flux caused by the variable X. The FCR in state analysis compares fluxes in a variety of respiratory states which may be separated by single or multiple variables, i.e. separated by several coupling and pathway control states.
If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-X); then YX is the background rate in the presence of the inhibitor.
  • X: Metabolic control variable acting on YX in the background state, to yield rate ZX in the reference state. X stimulates or un-inhibits YX from low flux to ZX at high flux.
  • YX: The rate in the background state Y is the non-activated or inhibited respiratory rate (low) in relation to the high rate ZX in the reference state Z. A metabolic control variable, X, acts on YX (substrate, activator) or is removed from Y (inhibitor) to yield ZX. The X-specific (in contrast to general) flux control ratio is Y/Z.
  • ZX: The rate in the reference state Z, stimulated or un-inhibited by a metabolic control variable, X, with high rate in relation to rate YX in the background state Y.


Pathway control efficiency

Pathway control efficiencies express the relative change of oxygen flux in response to a transition of (1) CHNO-fuel substrates or (2) inhibitors of enzyme steps in the pathway, in a defined coupling state.
» NS-N pathway control efficiency


Coupling-control efficiency

Coupling-control efficiencies are determined in an ET-pathway competent state. The terms coupling efficiency and coupling-control efficiency are used synonymously.

mt-Preparations

OXPHOS LEAK ET capacity In mitochondrial preparations, there are three well-defined coupling states of respiration, L, P, E (LEAK respiration, OXPHOS, Electron transfer pathway).
1. If the metabolic control variable, X, is an uncoupler, the reference rate ZX is E. Then two background states Y, of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on L or P in mt-preparations. The corresponding flux control efficiencies are:
2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ADP, D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP (DT-phosphorylation; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate Z is P at saturating concentrations of ADP. The background rate Y is L, and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:
3. If the background rate Y is L, the metablic control variable from L to P is ADP-saturated ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate Z is E, the coupling control ratio is expressed as the net P/E control ratio (compare 1 and 2):
  • (P-L)/E


Living cells

ROUTINE LEAK ET capacity L(Omy) and E can be induced in living cells, but rate P cannot. However, the ROUTINE rate of respiration R can be measured in living cells.
1. If the metabolic control variable X is an uncoupler, the reference rate Z is E. Then two background states, Y of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the LEAK respiration or ROUTINE state in living cells. The corresponding coupling control efficiencies are:
2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP (DT-phosphorylation; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate Z is R in living cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background rate Y is L, and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:
3. If the background rate Y is L, the metablic control variable from L to R is cell-controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate Z is E, the coupling control ratio is expressed as the net R/E control ratio (compare 1 and 2):
  • (R-L)/E


References


Keywords

  • Expand Bioblast links to Flux control efficiency


Questions.jpg


Click to expand or collaps
Bioblast links: Coupling control - >>>>>>> - Click on [Expand] or [Collapse] - >>>>>>>

1. Mitochondrial and cellular respiratory rates in coupling-control states

OXPHOS-coupled energy cycles. Source: The Blue Book
» Baseline state
Respiratory rate Defining relations Icon
OXPHOS capacity P = -Rox P.jpg mt-preparations
ROUTINE respiration R = -Rox R.jpg living cells
ET capacity E = -Rox E.jpg » Level flow
» Noncoupled respiration - Uncoupler
LEAK respiration L = -Rox L.jpg » Static head
» LEAK state with ATP
» LEAK state with oligomycin
» LEAK state without adenylates
Residual oxygen consumption Rox L = -Rox ROX.jpg
  • Chance and Williams nomenclature: respiratory states
» State 1 —» State 2 —» State 3 —» State 4 —» State 5

2. Flux control ratios related to coupling in mt-preparations and living cells

» Flux control ratio
» Coupling-control ratio
» Coupling-control protocol
FCR Definition Icon
L/P coupling-control ratio L/P L/P coupling-control ratio » Respiratory acceptor control ratio, RCR = P/L
L/R coupling-control ratio L/R L/R coupling-control ratio
L/E coupling-control ratio L/E L/E coupling-control ratio » Uncoupling-control ratio, UCR = E/L (ambiguous)
P/E control ratio P/E P/E control ratio
R/E control ratio R/E R/E control ratio » Uncoupling-control ratio, UCR = E/L
net P/E control ratio (P-L)/E net P/E control ratio
net R/E control ratio (R-L)/E net R/E control ratio

3. Net, excess, and reserve capacities of respiration

Respiratory net rate Definition Icon
P-L net OXPHOS capacity P-L P-L net OXPHOS capacity
R-L net ROUTINE capacity R-L R-L net ROUTINE capacity
E-L net ET capacity E-L E-L net ET capacity
E-P excess capacity E-P E-P excess capacity
E-R reserve capacity E-R E-R reserve capacity

4. Flux control efficiencies related to coupling-control ratios

» Flux control efficiency jZ-Y
» Background state
» Reference state
» Metabolic control variable
Coupling-control efficiency Definition Icon Canonical term
P-L control efficiency jP-L = (P-L)/P = 1-L/P P-L control efficiency P-L OXPHOS-flux control efficiency
R-L control efficiency jR-L = (R-L)/R = 1-L/R R-L control efficiency R-L ROUTINE-flux control efficiency
E-L coupling efficiency jE-L = (E-L)/E = 1-L/E E-L coupling efficiency E-L ET-coupling efficiency » Biochemical coupling efficiency
E-P control efficiency jE-P = (E-P)/E = 1-P/E E-P control efficiency E-P ET-excess flux control efficiency
E-R control efficiency jE-R = (E-R)/E = 1-R/E E-R control efficiency E-R ET-reserve flux control efficiency

5. General

» Basal respiration
» Cell ergometry
» Dyscoupled respiration
» Dyscoupling
» Electron leak
» Electron-transfer-pathway state
» Hyphenation
» Oxidative phosphorylation
» Oxygen flow
» Oxygen flux
» Permeabilized cells
» Phosphorylation system
» Proton leak
» Proton slip
» Respiratory state
» Uncoupling



Questions.jpg


Click to expand or collaps
Bioblast links: Normalization - >>>>>>> - Click on [Expand] or [Collapse] - >>>>>>>



MitoPedia concepts: MiP concept, Respiratory control ratio, SUIT concept 


MitoPedia methods: Respirometry 


Labels: MiParea: Respiration 




Regulation: Flux control 


HRR: Theory